| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |
Signal Transduction Unit-Laboratory of Cell Biology, Section of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology and Embryology, University of Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara [V. B., M. M., F. B., L. B., M. L. C., S. C.], and Laboratory of Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, 40100 Bologna [A. B.], Italy
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most relevant feature of the Vav family is the regulation of their GDP-GTP exchange activities by direct phosphorylation. More recently, it has been reported that tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav may also regulate other functions, including the formation of heteromolecular complexes that modulate the signal transmission and the termination of the activity of Vav itself at the end of the agonist stimulation (1) .
Vav becomes rapidly and transiently tyrosine phosphorylated upon triggering of a variety of surface receptors in almost every hematopoietic cell. It is reported extensively that Vav plays a critical role in lymphocyte development and activation, because it is phosphorylated in response to T-cell receptor and B-cell receptor activation (7
, 8)
. Upon receptor cross-linking, ITAMs become tyrosine phosphorylated by the Src family of tyrosine kinases and recruit the Syk/ZAP-70 family of tyrosine kinases, resulting in their phosphorylation and activation (9)
. Both Src and Syk families of protein tyrosine kinases then phosphorylate multiple intracellular proteins, including phospholipase C-
, SLP-76, and Vav (9, 10, 11)
. Tyrosine phosphorylation and/or activation of these substrates ultimately result in downstream cytokine gene induction and other effector functions.
The Syk/ZAP-70 family of tyrosine kinases constitutes an example of proteins that contain two SH2 domains, a tandem sequence that might confer high specificity in tyrosine kinase-mediated signaling (12) . Both ZAP-70 and Syk contain a consensus Vav SH2 domain binding sequence that seems to be critical for antigen receptor-mediated signal transduction (13) .
Recent data indicate that, despite the interaction with tyrosine kinases, the optimal phosphorylation of Vav requires the association with adaptor molecules that facilitate the spatial proximity between Vav and the upstream kinases. These associations also depend on the tyrosine phosphorylation of the adaptor proteins and the utilization of either the Vav SH3 or SH2 domains as interacting domains (1) . SLP-76, an adaptor protein predominantly expressed in T cells and myeloid cells and a substrate for ZAP-70 and Syk tyrosine kinases, was reported to associate via tyrosine-phosphorylated residues in its NH2-terminal domain with the SH2 domain of Vav, after ligation of the T-cell antigen receptor (14) . SLP-76 was also described as an important adaptor molecule that is regulated by Syk in C-reactive protein-stimulated platelets (15) and plays a critical role in FcRI-mediated activation of mast cells in vivo and in vitro (16) .
Little is known about the regulatory molecules that trigger the down-modulation of Vav signals. A potential negative regulator of Vav is Cbl, a proto-oncoprotein that has emerged recently as a component of tyrosine kinase-mediated signal transduction in a variety of cell types. Biochemical and genetic studies have identified Cbl as a negative regulator of Syk/ZAP-70 as well as other protein tyrosine kinases (reviewed in Ref. 17 ). Recently, Cbl has been found to associate with Vav upon T-cell receptor stimulation of primary murine lymphocytes and Jurkat T cells. This interaction appears to require the whole SH3-SH2-SH3 COOH-terminal domain of Vav and a proline-rich sequence of Cbl and seems to inhibit the Vav-dependent signal transduction (18) .
The biological responses induced by Vav can be placed in three different, although interdependent, groups: stimulation of Rho/Rac effectors; activation of transcriptional factors; and morphological changes associated with the actin reorganization (1) . Several reports indicated that the relationship between Vav and cytoskeleton, demonstrated also by partial colocalization of this protein with actin in several cytoskeletal structures, involves its GEF activity, inducing Rac and Rho-dependent cytoskeletal changes, and the induction of specific patterns of gene expression (1) .
A functional role of Vav was demonstrated in myeloid cells. Recent data reported the tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav in promyelocytic HL-60 cells upon cross-linking of the human Fc
RIIa1 (CD32), which contains an ITAM motif in its intracellular region (19)
. In addition, coimmunoprecipitation experiments performed on the same cell model demonstrated that Vav is associated with SLP-76 upon Fc
RIIa1 activation (19)
.
We have demonstrated recently that Vav protein increases its amount and its level of tyrosine phosphorylation in HL-60 cells induced to differentiate along the granulocytic lineage with ATRA (20)
. Although ATRA acts through a nuclear receptor, which directly elicits transcriptional activity, it also induces a specific pattern of expression and activity of enzymes of the phosphoinositide metabolism (21, 22, 23, 24, 25)
. In addition, we have reported that tyrosine-phosphorylated Vav is particularly abundant in nuclei of differentiated cells, in which we demonstrated the presence of Vav/PI 3-K/phospholipase C-
1 complexes (20)
.
The aim of this work was to identify the mechanism by which Vav is recruited and phosphorylated in HL-60 cells induced to differentiate with ATRA. We describe here the existence of protein complexes, including the tyrosine kinase Syk and the adapting molecules SLP-76 and Cbl, which can play a role in recruiting Vav. We also report the identification of Syk as a tyrosine kinase able to phosphorylate Vav when HL-60 cells differentiate, and the finding that tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav and its association with the p85 regulatory subunit of PI 3-K are essential for the modifications of nuclear morphology characterizing the granulocytic differentiation of this cell line.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To identify the molecules involved in the recruitment and phosphorylation of Vav in HL-60 cells induced to granulocytic differentiation, we analyzed the ability of Vav to associate with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. For this purpose, we have used lysates from whole cells and from highly purified membrane-depleted nuclei (Fig. 1A)
derived from both control and differentiated conditions. In control conditions, the cells were cultured without ATRA for 96 h, whereas differentiation was obtained by treatment with 1 µM ATRA for 96 h (21
, 22)
. The lysates were adsorbed on GST-fusion NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal Vav-SH3 and GST-fusion Vav-SH3-SH2-SH3 proteins. As expected (Fig. 1B)
, only the SH3-SH2-SH3 fragment of Vav associated with phosphorylated proteins, the most abundant of which migrated at Mr
75,000 and Mr 116,000 and at Mr 68,000 and Mr 75,000 in differentiated cells and nuclei, respectively. By probing with an anti-Cbl antibody, a protein comigrating with the phosphorylated band present in differentiated cells at Mr 116,000 was identified, the amount of which was closely similar in control and ATRA-treated cells. No detectable amount of Cbl associated with the SH3-SH2-SH3 fragment of Vav when purified nuclei were used for the adsorption experiments (Fig. 1B)
.
|
By reprobing the same membrane with an anti-Syk antibody, we identified the Mr 68,000 phosphoprotein shown in nuclei. Syk appeared to associate with the SH3-SH2-SH3 fragment of Vav in both cells and nuclei, without quantitative differences between control and differentiated conditions in whole cells, and increased during ATRA-induced differentiation in nuclei (Fig. 1B)
.
Immunoprecipitation experiments with the anti-Cbl antibody confirmed the presence of this adaptor protein in whole cells and showed only a weak increase in its amount and level of tyrosine phosphorylation during the differentiation process. In addition, Cbl associated with nonphosphorylated Vav and Syk, particularly in differentiated conditions (Fig. 1C)
. Incidentally, this kind of experiment confirmed that the preparations of nuclei used were purified rigorously. In fact, although Cbl is a major cytoplasmic protein in our cell model, no transfer of it from cytoplasms to nuclei occurred. The complete absence of any cytoskeletal contamination of the nuclei was demonstrated by probing nuclear lysates with an anti-ß-tubulin antibody, as reported in Fig. 1A
.
Immunoprecipitation with an anti-SLP-76 antibody failed to show any protein, probably because of the inadequacy of the antibody used (data not shown), although immunoprecipitations performed with an anti-Syk antibody confirmed the presence of this protein at the nuclear level, and showed after treatment with ATRA, an increase in its amount and tyrosine phosphorylation, particularly in purified nuclei (Fig. 1D)
. No significant amount of Vav protein was detected in anti-Syk immunoprecipitates (data not shown).
The Vav/Syk interaction was analyzed along the differentiation process, demonstrating that the association between these two molecules increases during ATRA treatment, particularly at the nuclear level, reaching a maximum after 4 days, in correspondence with a fully differentiated phenotype (Fig. 1E)
.
Syk Phosphorylates Vav in Vitro.
Because we have observed that Vav interacts with Syk, the tyrosine phosphorylation level of which increased after ATRA treatment, a possible role of Syk in phosphorylating Vav was analyzed. To determine the capability of Syk to phosphorylate Vav in our cell model, we performed an in vitro Syk kinase assay in which Vav, immunoprecipitated from control cells, was incubated with Syk immunoprecipitated from control or ATRA-treated cells. As shown in Fig. 2
, Vav became tyrosine phosphorylated when Syk that had immunoprecipitated from differentiated cells was used as a source of tyrosine kinase activity.
|
|
The level of tyrosine-phosphorylated Cbl was not affected by the simultaneous treatment of HL-60 with ATRA and piceatannol (Fig. 3C)
, suggesting that it is independent of Syk kinase activity. On the contrary, in the presence of piceatannol, the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated Vav was reduced, after ATRA treatment, in both cells and nuclei (Fig. 3D)
, confirming a role of activated Syk in the tyrosine-phosphorylation of this molecule. The amount of Vav in samples treated with both ATRA and piceatannol was similar to the ATRA-treated conditions, indicating that tyrosine phosphorylation is not required for nuclear localization of this protein (Fig. 3D)
.
To clarify the role of the ATRA-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav, we also evaluated its ability to interact with the different molecules when Syk activity was reduced by piceatannol. As demonstrated in Fig. 3D
, the association of Vav with Syk is not modified in the presence of piceatannol, in both cells and nuclei. Interestingly, the interaction with the regulatory subunit of PI 3-K we described previously (20)
is impaired when piceatannol is administered simultaneously with ATRA (Fig. 3D)
, indicating that the Syk kinase inhibitor reduces the phosphorylation of a tyrosine residue involved in the Vav/p85 association.
Immunoprecipitation experiments performed with an anti-p85 antibody showed that the amount of nuclear PI 3-K in ATRA-treated cells was not affected by piceatannol (Fig. 3E)
. On the contrary, the interaction with Vav was highly reduced, in both cells and nuclei, confirming that a Syk-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav is important for the Vav/PI 3-K association (Fig. 3E)
.
Inhibition of Syk Kinase Activity Prevents the Nuclear Changes Typical of Granulocytic Differentiation.
The effects of the reduced Syk-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav on granulocytic differentiation were analyzed. As reported in Table 1
, the accumulation of cells in the G0-G1 phases of the cell cycle observed during the ATRA treatment of HL-60 was not modified by piceatannol. Likewise, the number of cells expressing the surface antigen CD11b, commonly used to evaluate the level of ATRA-induced granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 (21
, 27) , after ATRA administration, was not affected by simultaneous treatment with piceatannol (Fig. 4A)
.
|
|
20%, as reported in Fig. 4C| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The adaptor protein SLP-76 was identified here as well as a phosphorylated protein interacting with the SH3-SH2-SH3 fragment of Vav in both cells and nuclei after ATRA treatment. Similar to Cbl, also in control conditions SLP-76 was found to be associated with the Vav fragment, without quantitative changes attributable to differentiation. Vav-associated SLP-76 was more abundant in nuclei than in whole-cell lysates, indicating a preferential association into the nucleus of these two molecules, at variance with an exclusive cytoplasmic distribution of Vav/Cbl complexes.
An interaction between Vav, Cbl, and SLP-76 was described previously. In particular, a role for Cbl was reported in HL-60 cells in which stimulation of ATRA-differentiated cells with anti-CD-38 monoclonal antibody induced its rapid tyrosine phosphorylation, suggesting the involvement of this adaptor protein in the transmembrane signaling mediated by CD-38 (29)
. An association between Vav and SLP-76 was demonstrated after treatment of HL-60 cells with the human Fc receptor for IgG, Fc
RII (CD32), which contains an ITAM motif in its intracellular region. A strong phosphorylation of Vav, SLP-76, and Cbl was also observed, suggesting that CD32 cross-linking induces the recruitment of molecules involved in gene activation or cytoskeletal rearrangement (19)
. A critical role for the interaction between SLP-76 and Vav was also shown in T-cell development and activation, in which these molecules may have a synergistic effect on interleukin-2 promoter activity (30)
.
Our report describes, for the first time, a compartmentalized association between these molecules during ATRA treatment (Cbl/Vav in the cytoplasm and SLP-76/Vav in the inner nuclear compartment), suggesting the activation of one or more Vav-related mechanisms of signal transduction from the cell membrane to the nuclear compartment.
A tyrosine-phosphorylated Syk was also found to be associated with the SH2 domain of Vav, according to the known presence of a consensus Vav-SH2 domain binding sequence in the Syk molecule (13) . Syk protein was also shown in control conditions, in both cells and nuclei, indicating that the interaction between these two proteins may also occur independently from Syk phosphorylation.
Cell fractionation studies confirmed that Syk is present in the nucleus of HL-60 cells and that Vav/Syk complexes are also present in the nuclear compartment, in which Vav-associated Syk increased during differentiation and was particularly evident after 4 days of ATRA treatment. These data, which report for the first time the presence of Syk and its association with Vav in the nuclear compartment, suggest a specific role for this tyrosine kinase in the nucleus of HL-60 cells induced to differentiate with ATRA, contributing to the modulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav.
An increase of Syk activity and of its tyrosine phosphorylation levels was observed previously during HL-60 differentiation along the granulocytic lineage induced by ATRA (31)
. It has been also reported that Syk plays a specific physiological role in signaling from Fc
Rs in neutrophils and macrophages (32)
, as shown by experiments performed with Syk-deficient cells.
In this paper we report that Vav is a potential target of Syk during ATRA-dependent maturation of HL-60 cells. We have demonstrated that Syk phosphorylates Vav in vitro, when immunoprecipitated from differentiated cells, and that this phosphorylation was abrogated when a specific Syk kinase inhibitor was administered simultaneously with the differentiating agent. In particular, when we used piceatannol to inhibit Syk kinase activity, a strong decrease of the tyrosine phosphorylation of both Syk and Vav occurred. This confirms the capability of Syk to autophosphorylate and supports its role in phosphorylating Vav in an ATRA-dependent manner. The reduced level of tyrosine phosphorylation of both Vav and Syk had no effect on their reciprocal association and on their accumulation inside the nuclear compartment. On the contrary, the reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav is accompanied by the decrease of its ability to interact with the p85 regulatory subunit of PI 3-K. This indicates that the ATRA-induced association of Vav with PI 3-K involves one or more tyrosines, the phosphorylation of which is prevented by the Syk inhibitor piceatannol.
Analysis of the cellular morphology revealed that the reduction of tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav corresponds to a strong reduction of the modifications of nuclear morphology, typically observed during granulocytic differentiation. This suggests that the ATRA-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav plays a crucial role in regulating the nucleoskeleton reorganization. Vav phosphorylation does not appear to be relevant for the expression of CD11b, widely used as a differentiation marker of HL-60 cells after ATRA treatment. However, it is essential for the changes in the nucleoskeleton assembly required to reach the morphological differentiated phenotype, according to the notion that Vav is involved in regulating the architecture of the cytoskeleton (1) .
We reported previously that reduced expression and activity of PI 3-K in HL-60 cells prevents ATRA-induced nuclear modifications, similarly to what we observed when we inhibited Vav phosphorylation and its association with p85. This evidence suggests that the Vav/PI 3-K complexes may regulate the rearrangement of nucleoskeleton of differentiating HL-60 cells in two different ways: (a) by Vav activity. It is known that GEF activity of Vav, regulated by second messengers derived from PI 3-K activity, induces GTPase-related cytoskeletal changes (1) ; and (b) by PI 3-K activity. The interaction between Vav and PI 3-K may be important for targeting this key enzyme of the lipid metabolism to its nuclear substrates. PI 3-K products may then be responsible for the nucleoskeletal reorganization by affecting actin polymerization (33 , 34) . In addition, the presence and the accumulation of a number of signaling molecules inside the nuclear compartment during granulocytic differentiation may indicate a cooperative role of different signaling pathways in the nuclear events leading to ATRA-induced differentiation.
The presence in our cell model of molecules with known functions of adaptor proteins downstream to a number of membrane receptor-induced signals, differently distributed in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Cbl, completely absent, and SLP-76, particularly abundant in the nuclear compartment), suggests that some steps of HL-60 differentiation depend on signals directed to the nuclear compartment that originated from specific membrane receptors. It is reported that in myeloid cells, ATRA induces modulation of expression and release of different cytokines (35, 36, 37) , some of which activate transduction pathways involving molecules that we have identified in ATRA-induced differentiation (38 , 39) . It is then possible that the ATRA-dependent transcriptional activity may modulate the expression of cytokines and/or their receptors and regulate the middle to late events of granulocytic differentiation by autocrine-paracrine mechanisms.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 clearly defined lobes) after 96 h of ATRA treatment as differentiated. The evidence obtained with DAPI exactly overlapped the results obtained with histological staining of the cells (May-Grünwald Giemsa). Monoclonal anti-ß-tubulin was from Sigma, and monoclonal antibodies against Vav and Syk and polyclonal antibody against SLP-76 were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Monoclonal anti-P-Tyr was obtained from Transduction Laboratories (PY20; Lexington, KY), and polyclonal anti-Cbl antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit, antimouse, and antisheep IgG (Sigma) were used as secondary antibodies.
Agarose-conjugated GST-fusion Vav SH3-COOH-terminal, SH3-NH2-terminal, and SH3-SH2-SH3 proteins were kindly provided by Andy Chan (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO).
Preparation of Nuclei, Lysates, and Immunoprecipitates.
Nuclei depleted of nuclear membranes were isolated essentially following a procedure described previously (21)
. Briefly, the cell fractionation buffer contained 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 2 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM NaCl. Triton X-100 (0.5%) was added, and after passage through a syringe with a 22-gauge needle, nuclei were stabilized by adding 3 mM MgCl2. All of the purification buffers contained 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 50 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM DTT, and 1 mM Na3VO4 (all from Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA). Nuclear purity was assessed by ultrastructural analysis and marker enzyme assays, as reported previously (21)
, and by probing nuclear lysates with an anti-ß-tubulin antibody.
Cells (10 x 106) and nuclei (100 x 106) were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% NP40, 0.25% sodium deoxycolate, 150 mM NaCl, 1mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml each a protinin and leupeptin, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 mM NaF. After 20 min of incubation at 4°C, the insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation for 15 min at 14,000 rpm. Supernatant, which constituted the total lysate, was incubated with the indicated antibodies overnight at 4°C and immunoprecipitated with protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The immunoprecipitates were washed four times with lysis buffer and resuspended in Laemmlis SDS sample buffer. The adsorption experiments with the GST-fusion proteins were performed, incubating lysates from cells and nuclei, overnight at 4°C with the different Vav fragments.
Immunochemical Analysis.
Total lysates (50 µg of protein) from cells (1 x 106) and nuclei (10 x 106), immunoprecipitates, and absorbed samples (from 1 mg protein) were separated on 7.5% polyacrylamide denaturing gels (40)
and blotted to nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Life Science, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). The blots were then incubated with the antibodies, and the final detection was performed using the ECL system (DuPont, NEN Research Products, Boston, MA), according to the manufacturers instructions. Densitometric analysis was performed on the Molecular Analyst GS670 (Bio-Rad).
Assay of Syk Kinase Activity.
Vav immunoprecipitated from total cells was subjected to in vitro phosphorylation with Syk immunoprecipitated from control and differentiated cells in the presence of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, 3 mM MnCl2, and 0.5 mM ATP. The reaction was allowed to continue for 15 min at 30°C and stopped by the addition of Laemmlis SDS sample buffer. The samples were then separated by electrophoresis, blotted, and analyzed for the amount of phosphorylated proteins, as reported above.
Inhibition of Syk Kinase Activity.
To inhibit Syk kinase activity, cells were treated with different concentrations of piceatannol (0.5 mg/ml in PBS), alone or simultaneously with 1 µM ATRA for 4 days; then lysates from total cells and purified nuclei were analyzed for their amount of phosphorylated proteins, as described above. The same samples were subjected to morphological examination of the nuclear shape and analysis of CD11b expression for evaluating their level of granulocytic differentiation, as described previously (21
, 27)
.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by grants from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Progetto Finalizzato Biotecnologie (CNR), and a 60% grant from the University of Ferrara (to S. C. and V. B.) and Progetto di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale (Ministero dellUniversità e Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica; to V. B.). M. L. C. is a Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro fellow. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Signal Transduction Unit-Laboratory of Cell Biology, Section of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology and Embryology, Via Fossato di Mortara, 66, 44100 Ferrara, Italy. Phone: 39-0532-291571; Fax: 39-0532-207351; E-mail: cps{at}dns.unife.it ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; SH, Src homology; ITAM, immunoreceptor tryrosine-based activation motif; ATRA, All-trans-retinoic acid; DAPI, 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; PI 3-K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Fc
R, Fc
receptor; P-Tyr, phosphotyrosine. ![]()
Received for publication 10/20/00. Revision received 3/ 9/01. Accepted for publication 3/12/01.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/CD3 induction of interleukin-2. Immunity, 6: 155-164, 1997.[Medline]
RIIa1 in promyelocytic HL-60 cells. Immunol. Lett., 68: 347-353, 1999.[Medline]
1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase during granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells. FEBS Lett., 441: 480-484, 1998.[Medline]
and -
isoforms in HL-60 cells induced to differentiate along the granulocytic lineage by all-trans retinoic acid. Br. J. Haematol., 93: 542-550, 1996.[Medline]
into the nucleus of HL-60 cell line plays a key role in the induction of granulocytic differentiation mediated by all-trans retinoic acid. Br. J. Haematol., 100: 541-549, 1998.[Medline]
II-ß3 signaling in platelets. Blood, 93: 2645-2652, 1999.
receptor signaling in macrophages and neutrophils. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 4209-4220, 1998.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Shen and A. Yen c-Cbl Tyrosine Kinase-binding Domain Mutant G306E Abolishes the Interaction of c-Cbl with CD38 and Fails to Promote Retinoic Acid-induced Cell Differentiation and G0 Arrest J. Biol. Chem., September 18, 2009; 284(38): 25664 - 25677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wightman, M. S. Roberson, T. J. Lamkin, S. Varvayanis, and A. Yen Retinoic Acid-induced Growth Arrest and Differentiation: Retinoic Acid Up-Regulates CD32 (Fc{gamma}RII) Expression, the Ectopic Expression of Which Retards the Cell Cycle Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2002; 1(7): 493 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |