| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |
Department of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, 2333AL, the Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To gain more knowledge about the process of immortalization and the genes involved, we performed mRNA differential display on SV40-transformed preimmortal and immortal cells to identify genes that play a role in this process. mRNA differential display is a PCR-based method that can be used to detect differences in expression between different cell populations (13
, 14)
. Here we report that T-STAR2
/Sam68-like mammalian protein 2 (SLM-2)/Sam68-like protein
(Salp
), a recently cloned gene (15, 16, 17)
, is strongly down-regulated in SV40-transformed immortal fibroblasts compared with preimmortal cells. T-STAR was identified in a yeast-two-hybrid screen as a protein interacting with the protein RNA-binding motif (RBM) in spermatogenesis (16)
. T-STAR is highly expressed in testis, muscle, and brain (15, 16, 17)
. The protein contains a STAR domain, an RNA-binding domain present in a growing family of proteins involved in developmental processes (18)
. T-STAR is highly homologous to Sam68, a STAR domain-containing protein found in human and mouse. Sam68 is a protein with an as-yet unknown function that binds to a variety of signal-transducing proteins and may act as an adaptor in signal-transduction pathways (15
, 17)
. Inactivation of Sam68 in mouse fibroblasts is associated with neoplastic transformation and tumorigenesis (19)
. We found that whereas T-STAR expression is down-regulated in SV40-transformed immortal fibroblasts, Sam68 expression is not affected. When T-STAR was reintroduced into SV40-transformed immortalized fibroblasts, a clear reduction in the number of colonies compared with controls was seen. Our data suggest that down-regulation of T-STAR might be important for cells to escape from crisis and confirm the role of T-STAR as a growth-inhibitory protein.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(GenBank accession no. AF069681; Ref. 15, 16, 17
).
|
|
Down-Regulation of T-STAR Occurs Only in Immortalized Cells Isolated after a Clear Proliferative Crisis.
To investigate whether down-regulation of T-STAR is a common event in SV40-transformed immortalized cells, we isolated RNA from seven different panels of preimmortal SV40-transformed fibroblasts and their immortalized counterparts. After Northern blotting, we examined T-STAR expression. Five of seven panels showed a clear reduction in the amount of T-STAR in the immortalized cells. In LF2859/SV and XP20 MA/SV postcrisis cells, no reduction in expression was visible (Fig. 3A)
. The SV40-transformed immortal cell-lines that were isolated in our laboratory can be divided into two groups as follows: (a) cell lines that were isolated after a clear proliferative crisis in which massive cell death took place and nearly all cells died before clones appeared which had gained immortality; and (b) immortal cells that arose without crisis and massive cell death taking place. T-STAR is only down-regulated in cells from the first group, whereas cells from the second group do not show down-regulation of T-STAR expression (Table 1)
. This correlation has been confirmed in other immortal cell lines recently isolated in our laboratory (data not shown). Thus, loss of T-STAR seems to be specific for immortal cells that have passed through a clear crisis.
|
|
T-STAR Is Down-Regulated in Immortal Cell Lines of Complementation Groups A, B, and D.
In the past, four different complementation groups, A, B, C and D, were identified by cell fusion of different immortal cell lines and subsequent screening for loss of immortality of the fused cells (20)
. This suggests that at least four different genetic pathways exist for cells to become immortal. Nearly all SV40-transformed immortal cells were classified into complementation group A. We examined T-STAR expression levels in cell lines representative for the four different complementation groups (Fig. 3C)
. In EJ, a bladder carcinoma cell line from complementation group A, T-STAR expression was comparable with the low expression levels in VH10/SV postcrisis cells. In HeLa (group B) and A1698 (group D) no T-STAR expression was detectable, and only CMV-Mj-HEL-1 (group C) cells showed clearly high levels of T-STAR. Thus, a low level of T-STAR expression is found in immortal cells from three different complementation groups, but is not a general feature of immortalized human cells.
Cellular Localization of T-STAR and Its Derivatives.
To test whether reintroduction of T-STAR leads to the loss of the immortal phenotype, three different constructs were cloned into the pcDNA3.1 expression vector: (a) pcT-STAR, containing the wild-type T-STAR; (b) a deletion mutant lacking the NH2-terminal 150 aa of T-STAR containing most of the STAR domain (
STAR), and (c),
NLS, a mutant lacking the last 20 aa of the COOH terminus containing a putative nuclear localization signal based on the homology to Sam68 (Ref. 21
and Fig. 4A
). All three constructs were cloned in-frame with a COOH-terminal myc-epitope. After transient transfection of these constructs into VH10/SV immortal cells, cellular localization was examined using immunofluorescence with an antibody against the myc-epitope. With immunofluorescence, the
STAR protein could not be detected after transfection, although using Western blotting it became clear that the protein is expressed after transfection in these cells (data not shown). wt T-STAR was localized in the nucleus, whereas the
NLS protein was localized in the cytoplasm. Thus we demonstrate that a functional NLS of T-STAR is encoded in the last 20 aa in the COOH-terminus of the protein, confirming previous results shown by other groups (Refs. 16
and 22
; Fig. 4B
).
|
NLS mutant clearly show less colonies compared with the empty vector. This reduction is in the same order of magnitude as the reduction obtained with the wt protein. Apparently, although the mutant protein is not localized in the nucleus, it still shows growth-inhibitory effects. On the dishes with cells transfected with
STAR, little reduction is visible, suggesting that the mutant protein lacking the STAR domain does not inhibit growth. However, because expression of the
STAR construct seems lower than expression of the other constructs (see above), it cannot be excluded that higher levels of the
STAR protein might also exert an effect.
|
To investigate whether the four clones expressing T-STAR might be selected by virtue of mutations in the transfected gene, mRNAs expressed from the construct were sequenced. In all four clones, the expressed mRNA was wild type. Thus, although there is a selection against T-STAR expression in these immortal cells, a subset of the cells can still proliferate in the presence of T-STAR.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In most immortal cell lines, telomerase activity can be detected, leading to stabilization of the telomeric length required for indefinite growth (24) . In addition, exogenous expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, is able to immortalize normal human fibroblasts (25) . Notably, T-STAR and telomerase are both described to be involved in spermatogenesis, and expression levels of T-STAR increase in the later stages of spermatogenesis, whereas telomerase activity decreases in the later stages (16 , 26) . As telomerase apparently seems to play such a pivotal role in immortalization, we tested whether there was a correlation between T-STAR expression and telomerase activity. In our experiments, however, we did not find a relation between presence of telomerase activity and T-STAR expression (data not shown).
Next, we asked whether down-regulation of T-STAR would be a prerequisite for the maintenance of the immortalized phenotype in the cells that went through a clear crisis. Reintroduction of T-STAR into the VH/SV postcrisis cells led to a profound reduction in the number of colonies formed, indicating that T-STAR has a negative effect on cellular growth. This is in accordance with findings by Lee and Burr (17)
in chicken embryo fibroblasts. When cells were transfected with a mutant lacking the NLS (
NLS), the mutant protein is located mainly in the cytoplasm but does not lead to abrogation of this effect. Because T-STAR is involved in pre-mRNA processing and regulation of the selection of specific splice sites (23)
, overexpressed T-STAR might cause a different splicing pattern. If T-STAR is involved in the formation of specific mRNAs, overexpression of T-STAR might lead to an increase in the formation of these mRNAs and a reduction of the formation of other mRNAs. This might reduce or enhance the levels of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in cellular growth. When T-STAR lacking the NLS,
NLS, is not properly located in the nucleus but resides in the cytoplasm, an analogous mechanism can be envisioned. Because of a lack of T-STAR in the nucleus, its target mRNAs are not spliced as they would be normally. The lack of these properly spliced mRNAs might prevent the production of proteins essential to proliferation, resulting in inhibited growth.
Alternatively, if the negative effect on growth of T-STAR acts via its STAR domain and thus via RNA binding, T-STAR, when located in the cytoplasm, might still bind to its target and hence could prevent proper translation of mRNA(s). A similar effect might occur when other nuclear RNA-binding proteins are prevented from entering the nucleus, but seems not to be a general feature of nuclear proteins retained in the cytoplasm per se (27 , 28) .
Previously, it was reported that overexpression of T-STAR results in lower protein levels of Sam68 in chicken embryo fibroblasts (17) , suggesting that Sam68 mRNA might be a substrate for T-STAR. In human cells, however, we did not observe lower Sam68 protein levels in the clones stably expressing T-STAR protein compared with cells not expressing T-STAR (data not shown), Low expression or lack of expression of T-STAR was found not to be restricted to SV40-transformed and immortalized cell lines but was observed also in cell lines belonging to other complementation groups (20) , with the exception of the CMV-Mj-HEL-1 cells, which have considerable levels of T-STAR. It should be noted that because we do not have precrisis CMV-Mj-HEL-1 cells, we cannot determine whether down-regulation of T-STAR upon immortalization in these cells took place or not. In short, although the preimmortalized counterparts of these cells were not available for comparison, these results suggest that T-STAR down-regulation is a more general event occurring also during immortalization mediated by other transforming agents than SV40 Large T. By inference, the tested representatives for the complementation groups could have originated from clones that arose after a crisis-like event.
Despite the growth-suppressive effect of exogenous T-STAR expression, we were able to isolate four clones which stably express nonmutated forms of T-STAR. At present, we cannot exclude that in these clones T-STAR is inactive because of mutations in other genes. In combination with the fact that loss of T-STAR is not observed in SV40-transformed immortal lines that have not gone through crisis, this result indicates that down-regulation of T-STAR is not a prerequisite for immortalization per se. Rather, loss of T-STAR could be a factor that enables cells to survive during crisis, thus providing cells time to accumulate additional mutations needed to become immortal. Identifying the targets of T-STAR during pre-mRNA processing, or proteins binding to T-STAR, could provide insight into immortalization in general and crisis in particular.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transfection of Cells.
For transient or stable transfection of the VH10/SV postcrisis cells, we used the calcium phosphate transfection protocol (29)
with a 10% DMSO shock after 5 h of incubation of the precipitate on the cells. Colonies were stained using Giemsa stain (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
Reverse Transcription, Differential Display and Fragment Isolation.
Differential display was essentially performed as described (13
, 14)
with a few modifications (30)
. In brief, cytoplasmic RNA was isolated from growing cells and treated with DNase. cDNA was made of 2.5 µg of RNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) in the presence of a 5' DIG-labeled T12MC primer, where M is a 3-fold degenerate for C, A, or G (dNTP). Low stringency amplification reactions were performed using the same downstream primer and arbitrary random decamer primers under the following PCR protocol: 30'' 95°C, 60'' 38°C, 60'' 72°C for 40 cycles using ULTMA DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT). Primers used to identify T-STAR were downstream primer DIG-T12MC and upstream primer 5'-CAAGCGAGGT-3'. Part of the reaction was resolved on a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel. After blotting onto Hybond N membrane (Amersham Life Science, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdome), DIG-labeled products were visualized as described (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Bands of interest were cut from the filter and eluted overnight at 65°C in 100 µl of 1.2 M NaCl, and 1% SDS. The eluent was purified over a Sephadex G50 column, and 5 µl of the eluent was used for a reamplification step of the DNA fragments with the T12MC primer (not DIG-labeled) and the upstream random decamer primer. PCR fragments were cloned into the pCR2.1 cloning vector (Invitrogen Corporation, Leek, the Netherlands). Colonies were screened for inserts with PCR using the appropriate primers. Using Spot-blots, colonies were screened for the correct insert (30)
.
Sequencing.
Double-stranded DNA from the cloned fragments was sequenced with M13 forward and reverse primers and a T7 sequencing kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). The fragment was identified using the BLAST program (National Center for Biotechnology Information; Bethesda, MD).
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis.
RNA isolation and Northern blotting was performed as described (31)
. Twenty µg of total RNA were loaded for Northern blotting. Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated using an mRNA Isolation Kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Poly(A) RNA (2.5 µg) were used for Northern blotting. Probes used for analysis of expression were labeled by random priming with [32P
]ATP. A 474-bp probe for T-STAR was amplified from a cDNA made from VH10/SV precrisis cells using 5'-GGTTGGATGTTTCAACAAAGTAG-3' as upstream primer and 5'-TTCTCACTCCCAGAGCAAG-3' as reverse primer. A rat GAPDH probe was used as a control for equal loading. As a probe for Sam68, a cloned 530-bp fragment, amplified by PCR using 5'-TGGTACACCAGTAAGGGGAG-3' as an upstream primer and 5'-TAAGGTGGGGAGAAGAAGG-3' as a downstream primes, was used.
Plasmids.
The T-STAR open reading frame was amplified by PCR using PfX DNA polymerase (Stratagene Cloning Systems, La Jolla, CA) from pACT::T-STAR (kindly provided by Julia P. Venables, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK) containing most of the mRNA for T-STAR (16)
. As upstream primer STA 5'-CGGAATTCCGCCGCCATGGAGGAGAAGTACCTGCCC-3' was used containing an EcoRI restriction site upstream of the start codon and a Kozak sequence just upstream of the start codon. The reverse primer STB 5'-CGCGGATCCGCGGTATCTGCCATATGGCTGGTCTCT-3' contains a BamHI restriction site downstream of the last coding codon, the BamHI site was used to clone the open reading frame in-frame with the myc-tag into plasmid pcDNA3.1(-)/Myc-HisA (Invitrogen). The
STAR mutant was constructed by PCR amplification using as upstream primer 5'-CGGAATTCCCGCCGCCATGATCAAAAAGTTCCTCATC-3' and STB as a downstream primer and cloned into pcDNA3.1 using the EcoRI and BamHI sites. The
NLS mutant was constructed in the same way using as upstream primer STA and as a downstream primer 5'-CGCGGATCCGCGGTTAGTCCACTCTTCTTGCCCGTA-3'.
Western Blotting, Immunofluorescence.
Lysates were made using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, and 15 µg of protein/sample were loaded on gel. For immunofluorescence, cells were fixed in 80% acetone. The 9E10 anti-myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) antibody was used in a 1:1000 dilution to detect the myc-tagged proteins. For immunofluorescence the nuclei of the cells were stained using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Sylvius Laboratory, Wassenaarseweg 72, 2333AL, Leiden, the Netherlands. Phone: 31-71-5276424; E-mail: C.Terleth{at}LUMC.nl ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: T-STAR, testis-signal transduction and activation of RNA; Sam68, 68-kDa Src substrate associated during mitosis; NLS, nuclear localization signal; aa, amino acid(s); wt, wild type; DIG, digoxigenin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. ![]()
Received for publication 5/22/01. Revision received 9/10/01. Accepted for publication 9/17/01.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
i
kyte D., van der Haegen B. A. E6 of human papillomavirus type 16 can overcome the M1 stage of immortalization in human epithelial cells but not in human fibroblasts. Oncogene, 8: 1407-1413, 1993.[Medline]
, and Salpß, growth-arresting homologs of Sam68. Gene, 240: 133-147, 1999.[Medline]
11b. Oncogene, 14: 1-16, 1997.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. E. Lukong, D. Larocque, A. L. Tyner, and S. Richard Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Sam68 by Breast Tumor Kinase Regulates Intranuclear Localization and Cell Cycle Progression J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38639 - 38647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Venables, C. Dalgliesh, M. P. Paronetto, L. Skitt, J. K. Thornton, P. T. Saunders, C. Sette, K. T. Jones, and D. J. Elliott SIAH1 targets the alternative splicing factor T-STAR for degradation by the proteasome Hum. Mol. Genet., July 15, 2004; 13(14): 1525 - 1534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Coyle, B. W. Guzik, Y.-C. Bor, L. Jin, L. Eisner-Smerage, S. J. Taylor, D. Rekosh, and M.-L. Hammarskjold Sam68 Enhances the Cytoplasmic Utilization of Intron-Containing RNA and Is Functionally Regulated by the Nuclear Kinase Sik/BRK Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 92 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |