| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |
Degradation
SUGEN Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080-4811 [R. A. B., S. A. C.], and Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom [P. G-P., P. J. P.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and its subsequent degradation. Enforced expression of PKC
inhibited PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis, whereas expression of PKC
and PKC
did not, a finding consistent with a model in which PKC
negatively regulates G1-to-S-phase progression. We used mutagenesis to map a critical Src phosphorylation site on PKC
to tyrosine 311. A mutant form of PKC
in which tyrosine 311 was replaced with phenylalanine (Y311F) was more stable in the presence of Src, suggesting that Src-induced degradation was a direct result of PKC
tyrosine phosphorylation. We conclude that PKC
is downstream of Src but is unlikely to play a positive role in the signaling pathway by which Src promotes DNA synthesis. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is unlikely that Src kinases have only a single substrate involved in the regulation of mitogenesis. Src substrates possibly involved in PDGF signaling include PKC
(6)
, the PDGFR itself (7)
, Shc (8)
, Grb-2 (9)
, the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) receptor (10)
, the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase p85
subunit (11
, 12)
, and Eps8 (13)
. Here we focus on the role of Src in PKC
regulation and the possible role that PKC
plays in the regulation of mitogenesis.
It has previously been reported that PKC
serves as a substrate for Src (14)
. However, there is some disagreement about the effect of tyrosine phosphorylation on PKC
activity. Some reports suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation activates PKC
(14
, 15)
or modifies its substrate preference (16)
. Others report that tyrosine phosphorylation decreases PKC
activity (17
, 18)
. It should be noted that these apparently conflicting studies differ in several key aspects, including whether they used purified PKC
tyrosine phosphorylated in vitro or PKC
extracted from stimulated cells, the cell type, the nature of the stimulus, and whether they measured PKC
activity directly or addressed changes in PKC activity in different cellular fractions.
Several reports have also suggested that PKC
is involved in PDGF signaling. Li et al. (6)
note that in cells overexpressing both PDGFR and PKC
, PDGF causes an increase in PKC activity associated with the membrane fraction, the exclusive location of tyrosine-phosphorylated PKC
. Translocation of PKC
to the membrane fraction is also observed in PDGF-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells (19)
and fibroblasts (20)
. In addition, a kinase-inactive mutant of PKC
inhibits cellular transformation by the sis proto-oncogene, which is closely related to PDGF (21)
. The results of Li et al. (21)
imply that PKC
promotes PDGFR-stimulated anchorage-independent growth. This is somewhat at odds with other data concerning the effect of PKC
. For example, kinase-active PKC
has been shown to inhibit cell cycle progression. Watanabe et al. (22)
show that phorbol ester treatment of Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing PKC
causes them to arrest in G2/M phase. Also, overexpression of PKC
in either NIH3T3 cells or human glioma cells reduces their rate of growth and the density to which they grow (23
, 24)
.
In the experiments described here, we have examined in more detail the role of Src phosphorylation of PKC
and its involvement in PDGF-mediated signal transduction.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in Src-transformed Cells.
was highly tyrosine-phosphorylated in NIH3T3 cells stably transfected with an activated mutant of Src (527 cells), consistent with previous reports that PKC
is a Src substrate. However, we also noted that the level of PKC
was significantly lower in 527 cells compared with the parental NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 1A)
. This elevation of PKC
tyrosine phosphorylation also corresponded with a modest decrease in the level of PKC
(Fig. 1A)
|
after treatment with PMA, but unlike PDGF stimulation, PMA did not stimulate detectable tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
in NIH3T3 cells. However, both PDGF and PMA increased the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
in 527 cells. This is consistent with previous studies in which activation of PKC
renders it a better substrate for Src (14)
. It is also likely that phorbol ester stimulates translocation of PKC
to the membrane (27
, 28) , making it more accessible to Src.
The apparent reduction of the steady-state level of PKC
in 527 cells was not due to impaired detection of the tyrosine-phosphorylated form because the anti-COOH-terminal antibody used to immunoprecipitate PKC
was clearly able to recognize tyrosine-phosphorylated PKC
(Fig. 1A)
, and similar experiments using an antibody raised to a fusion protein of the NH2-terminal half of PKC
also showed a lower level of PKC
in 527 cells (data not shown). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation of 35S-labeled PKC
, followed by detection by autoradiography, also showed a decreased level of PKC
in 527 cells (Fig. 1B)
. In addition, treatment of tyrosine-phosphorylated PKC
with alkaline phosphatase did not increase the apparent level of PKC
detected, despite reducing the phosphorylation (data not shown). Nor was the decreased level of PKC
in 527 cells a clonal artifact or NIH3T3 cell specific, because TGR-1 cells [a fibroblastic cell line derived from Rat-1 (29)
] also had a lower level of endogenous PKC
when stably transfected with an activated mutant of human Src (tyrosine 530 mutated to phenylalanine; human SrcY530F; Fig. 1C
).
We considered the possibility that the decreased level of PKC
detected in Src-transformed cells might be due to its translocation to a detergent-insoluble fraction, although this seemed unlikely because even protein-denaturing extraction conditions (see "Materials and Methods") failed to increase the level of PKC
detected. If insolubility were the cause of the decreased level of PKC
, its level would be diminished according to its distribution between the cell fractions, but the rate of protein turnover would be unaltered. We therefore compared the stability of PKC
in NIH3T3 cells and 527 cells. PKC
showed little sign of degradation over a 6-h period in NIH3T3 cells as determined by 35S pulse chase (Fig. 2A)
or using cycloheximide to inhibit protein synthesis (Fig. 2B)
. However, PKC
was much less stable in 527 cells. Both 35S pulse-chase and cycloheximide treatment revealed an increased rate of PKC
turnover relative to that of the parental NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 2, A and B)
. The half-life of PKC
was estimated as 3.5 h in 527 cells by quantitation of 35S autoradiography. We also asked whether Src affected the level of PKC
mRNA. Fig. 2C
shows a Northern blot comparing the level of PKC
mRNA in 527 cells and the parental NIH3T3 cells. We found no evidence that expression of activated Src affects the PKC
transcript level. We therefore conclude that the level of PKC
is reduced through increased degradation.
|
degradation and to determine whether proteasomes were involved, we measured the effect of proteasome inhibitors on the level of PKC
in 527 cells. Clasto-lactacystin-ß-lactone, which inhibits several different peptide hydrolytic activities of the proteasome (33)
, and MG132, which inhibits protein degradation by the proteasome without affecting its ATPase or isopeptidase activity (34
, 35)
, both elevated the level of PKC
in 527 cells (Fig. 2D)
.
Recently, Hanke et al. (37)
described the tyrosine kinase inhibitors PP1 and PP2 and demonstrated that they were potent Src family kinase inhibitors, but only weakly inhibited ZAP-70 and JAK2. In further analysis of the selectivity of these compounds, we found that they inhibited both PDGFR kinase activity and Src kinase activity with similar potency (PP1-Src IC50 = 0.4 µM, PP1-PDGFR IC50 = 1.6 µM, PP2-Src IC50 = 1.4 µM, and PP2-PDGFR IC50 = 1.5 µM), precluding us from using them to study the role of Src in PDGF signal transduction. However, we could use them to study Src-transformed cells. For example, we have observed that PP1 and PP2 reverse the transformed phenotype of 527 cells, causing them to flatten and lose their characteristic actin rings.3
We examined the effect of PP2 on the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
and on its protein level in 527 cells. PP2 both decreased the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
and increased its protein level, effectively reversing the effects of Src on PKC
(Fig. 3A)
. This supports the conclusion that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
results in its instability.
|
had on its intrinsic kinase activity. We measured the PKC
-associated kinase activity in 527 cells overexpressing PKC
(527
cells) that had been treated with PP2 or mock-treated with solvent alone. Fig. 3B
kinase activity detected in decreasing concentrations of cell lysate. Also shown are the levels of PKC
protein in each immunoprecipitate. Consistent with Fig. 3A
(Fig. 3B
kinase activity was lower than in the control cells in which PKC
remains tyrosine-phosphorylated. The lower level of PKC
activity was not caused by PP2 copurifying with and inhibiting PKC
because it had no effect on PKC
activity when added directly to the cell lysate as opposed to the preincubation with intact cells (data not shown). We conclude that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
by Src has two effects: (a) it increases the specific activity of PKC
; and (b) it also causes the protein to become unstable.
PKC
and PDGF Stimulation.
We next measured the time course of PKC
tyrosine phosphorylation and activity during stimulation of cells by PDGF. PKC
underwent only a brief period of tyrosine phosphorylation during the initial 2030 min of PDGF stimulation of TGR-1 cells (Fig. 4A)
or NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 1A)
. Tyrosine phosphorylation was followed by a modest decrease in the level of PKC
in both cell types. PDGF also stimulated a brief period of activation (this is more convincing in TGR-1 cells, which express higher levels of PKC
than NIH3T3 cells; Fig. 4A
and data not shown) followed by a sustained decrease in PKC
activity in both TGR-1 cells and NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 4, B and C)
. This pattern of tyrosine phosphorylation, activation, and decrease in protein levels is consistent with the effects of PKC
tyrosine phosphorylation in Src-transformed cells.
|
is probably part of the mechanism that terminates the brief pulse of PKC
activity, but what is its significance with regard to the mitogenic signal of PDGF? One way to address this is to maintain artificially high PKC
levels by ectopic expression from plasmids microinjected into cells. We used bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into newly synthesized DNA to compare the effect of PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
expression on PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis. PKC
expression caused a significant reduction in the number of cells entering S phase, whereas in cells overexpressing PKC
and PKC
, the percentage of cells entering S phase was unaltered (Fig. 5A)
activity prevents or delays cells from proceeding from G1 to S phase. Although we do not know the function of the brief activation of PKC
, if any, we suggest that its rapid termination is important for PDGF-stimulated mitogenesis.
|
, overexpression of activated Src might be expected to rescue the inhibition of DNA synthesis by PKC
. As before, PKC
inhibited PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis. Coexpression of activated Src with PKC
caused a significant elevation in the number of PDGF-stimulated cells entering S phase, consistent with a rescue of the PKC
block by Src (Fig. 5B)
caused a smaller but significant elevation of the number of unstimulated cells entering S phase.
Analysis of PKC
Mutants for Tyrosine Phosphorylation, Stability, and Function.
Several studies have sought to identify sites of tyrosine phosphorylation on PKC
. Szallasi et al. (38)
demonstrated that mutation of tyrosine 52 reduced IgE antigen-induced tyrosine phosphorylation. Li et al. (39)
identified tyrosine 187 as a phosphorylation site. Konishi et al. (40)
demonstrated that mutation of tyrosines 512 and 523 within the kinase domain abolished enzyme activation, but they noted that the mutated enzyme was still phosphorylated to some extent in response to H2O2. To identify other sites phosphorylated by Src, we generated a series of PKC
tyrosine to phenylalanine (YF) point mutants targeting conserved tyrosines with high surface probability and NH2-terminal acidic groups, because these features are often seen in peptide substrates of tyrosine kinases (41)
. The YF point mutations included: (a) Y311F, which lies in the extended region between the cysteine-rich domains and the kinase domain; (b) Y372F, which lies in the small lobe of the kinase domain; (c) Y565F, which lies in the large lobe of the kinase domain; and (d) Y628F, which lies in the COOH-terminal tail. We tested the ability of Src to phosphorylate the PKC
YF mutants by coexpressing them with activated Src in HEK293 cells (Fig. 6A)
and assaying the level of PKC
tyrosine phosphorylation. Although we often saw a slight reduction in the level of tyrosine phosphorylation of several mutants relative to the wild type, PKC
Y311F was unique in that it was not a substrate for Src, with no phosphorylation over the background being detected. It is interesting to note that the sequence surrounding tyrosine 311 shows the highest similarity to the optimal Src substrate sequence predicted by Songyang et al. (42)
.
|
in HEK293 (human embryo renal cortical) cells is significantly reduced when activated Src is expressed [compare the level of endogenous PKC
in the control mock-transfected HEK293 cells in the far left lane of the bottom panel of Fig. 6A
in cells transfected with activated Src in Lane Src - (seventh from the left)]. Even when highly expressed by transient transfection in HEK293 cells, PKC
shows a Src-dependent decrease in its protein level in the presence of cycloheximide (Fig. 6C)
degradation is not specific to fibroblastic cell lines.
As part of our study of the tyrosine phosphorylation sites of PKC
, we also performed a series of experiments designed to detect tyrosine phosphorylation of COOH-terminal fragments of PKC
. Lysates of 527 cells were digested with immobilized trypsin, and then fragments containing the COOH terminus were isolated by immunoprecipitation using an antibody raised to the extreme COOH-terminal sequence of PKC
. The fragments were analyzed by antiphosphotyrosine immunoblot (Fig. 6B)
. Digestion with trypsin over a period of 60 min reduced the 7883-kDa PKC
band to a trypsin-resistant fragment of 20 kDa. We were concerned about whether this fragment was really derived from PKC
, and not from another protein with an epitope recognized by the COOH-terminal antibody that was exposed when digested with trypsin. We addressed this by comparing the level of the 20-kDa fragment in 527 cells with that of 527 cells overexpressing PKC
(Fig. 6B)
. Comparison of the level of the 20-kDa protein in the two right lanes of Fig. 6B
shows that trypsinization of the lysate from cells overexpressing PKC
produced an elevated level of the 20-kDa protein relative to the parental cells. This strongly suggests that the 20-kDa fragment is indeed derived from PKC
. This 20-kDa fragment contains both the COOH terminus and at least one site of tyrosine phosphorylation. A COOH-terminal fragment containing tyrosine 311 would be 42 kDa in size. Even allowing for aberrant SDS-PAGE mobility, it is unlikely that the COOH-terminal trypsin-resistant 20-kDa fragment contains tyrosine 311, suggesting that additional tyrosine phosphorylation sites exist. The fact that a single mutation was capable of blocking all detectable phosphorylation of PKC
by Src and the experiments described above are consistent with a mechanism of processive phosphorylation beginning with tyrosine 311.
We have presented evidence that Src promotes the degradation of PKC
. Although PKC
is a Src substrate, it is not certain that its tyrosine phosphorylation is directly responsible for its degradation. The initiation of degradation may occur via an indirect mechanism involving either diacylglycerol, the original second messenger shown to activate PKC isoforms, or phosphatidylinositol-3,4-P2 or phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-P3, which were identified more recently as second messengers that activate the PKC isoforms
,
, and
. We do not believe that phosphatidylinositol-3,4-P2 or phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-P3 is involved in the Src-induced degradation of PKC
because the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase inhibitor LY294002 (25 µM) had no effect on PKC
levels in Src-transformed cells (data not shown), but this does not disprove the involvement of a second messenger. The fact that Src was unable to phosphorylate PKC
Y311F enabled us to test whether Src is required to phosphorylate PKC
to promote its degradation. The stability of PKC
WT or PKC
Y311F was compared in the presence or absence of activated Src, using cycloheximide to inhibit protein synthesis in transfected HEK293 cells. To avoid fluctuations in PKC
levels due to differences in transfection efficiency, each time course of cycloheximide treatment was performed on a single transfected sample divided equally between time points. Transiently expressed PKC
WT and PKC
Y311F were stable over the 4-h experiment in the presence of cycloheximide. When cotransfected with activated Src, PKC
WT was rapidly degraded (Fig. 6C)
in a manner similar to that seen for endogenous PKC
in cells stably transfected with activated Src (Fig. 2B)
. In contrast, PKC
Y311F showed no sign of degradation when cotransfected with activated Src. We conclude that Src-induced degradation of PKC
is a direct result of its tyrosine phosphorylation. We were curious to see whether PKC
Y311F was also resistant to degradation induced by phorbol esters, so we tested the effect of PMA on HEK293 cells transiently transfected with PKC
WT or PKC
Y311F. Both PKC
and PKC
Y311F were stable over the 8-h period of the experiment when treated with DMSO alone as a control. However, PMA (100 nM) reduced the level of both PKC
WT and PKC
Y311F within 4 h of treatment (Fig. 6D)
. Therefore, mutation of tyrosine 311, although able to protect PKC
against Src-induced degradation, does not protect it against the degradation elicited by PMA treatment.
Having shown that coexpression of an activated mutant of Src is able to rescue the inhibition of PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis by PKC
(Fig. 5B)
, we went on to test whether this was also true for PKC
Y311F. Fig. 5C
shows the proportion of NIH3T3 cells going through PDGF-stimulated S-phase entry after the expression of SrcY527F and PKC
Y311F. As in Fig. 5B
, expression of SrcY527F caused a slight elevation of DNA synthesis in unstimulated cells. However, SrcY527F did not cause an additional increase in DNA synthesis in PDGF-stimulated cells. PKC
Y311F was similar to PKC
WT in that its expression inhibited PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis. However, coexpression of SrcY527F did not show any significant rescue of the inhibition of DNA synthesis by PKC
Y311F, suggesting that the mechanism by which Src rescues the PKC
block requires the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
at tyrosine 311.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, to determine whether it is part of the PDGF signal transduction pathway downstream of Src that is required for DNA synthesis. Our data implicate PKC
in this pathway but do not support a simple positive kinase cascade model. Src activates PKC
but promotes its degradation, and sustained expression of PKC
inhibits DNA synthesis.
One model that fits these data predicts that Src negatively regulates the level of PKC
, a negative regulator of DNA synthesis, thereby promoting a mitogenic signal. However, it is probably not that simple because Src also transiently activates PKC
. It is also clear that PKC
activation and the fall in its protein level follow a tightly regulated temporal pattern during the very early stages of PDGF stimulation. As an aside, other stimuli unrelated to mitogenesis have also been shown to activate a pulse of PKC
activity. The calcium-mobilizing agents carbachol and substance P stimulate a pulse of PKC
activity in salivary gland parotid acinar cells (43)
. It is not certain whether it is the initial activation of PKC
or the cessation of its signal that is important for mitogenesis. The fact that sustained expression of PKC
inhibits cell growth suggests the latter hypothesis. Whereas this may represent a real antimitogenic function, we must also consider the possibility that it is due to inappropriate expression of PKC
. However, the fact that neither PKC
nor PKC
expression was inhibitory suggests some specificity of the effect. Others have also described a negative effect of PKC
on cell growth, but with some important differences. Watanabe et al. (22)
observed cell cycle arrest in G2-M phase, whereas our data demonstrate a block in G1-S phase. This difference could be due to the different stimuli being used. Watanabe et al. examined the effect of TPA treatment, whereas our data apply exclusively to PDGF stimulation. Another study based on the pharmacological effects of TPA and bryostatin-1 suggests that PKC
has an antimitogenic function. Lu et al. (44)
demonstrate that bryostatin-1, which has complex effects on PKC
including the inhibition of TPA-induced down-regulation of PKC
in cells overexpressing c-Src, blocks the tumor-promoting effects of TPA. It is also likely that one of the other PKC isoforms mediates a positive role in PDGF-stimulated mitogenesis. A series of dominant inhibitory PKC mutants with broad specificity have recently been described (45)
. Expression of these forms of PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
inhibit PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis,4
suggesting that broad inhibition of PKC activation results in a mitogenic block.
The mechanism of PKC
regulation has important implications for cell growth and might be expected to involve multiple levels of control and be regulated by converging signaling pathways. Olivier et al. (46)
demonstrate that transforming growth factor ß1 selectively blocks bombesin-induced down-regulation of PKC
within S phase. Shih et al. (47)
reported that TPA regulates PKC
expression by down-regulating its mRNA both transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally. However, we found no evidence that Src affects the level of PKC
mRNA. Rather, our evidence implicates Src in the degradation of PKC
. This adds to the growing body of evidence that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
activates it but renders it highly susceptible to degradation. Recently, Zang et al. (18)
demonstrated that the viral homologue of Src, v-Src, is able to form a complex with PKC
that becomes phosphorylated on tyrosine. Whereas Zang et al. (18)
noted a decrease in PKC
activity, they did not address its cause or whether PKC
protein levels were altered. The effect of proteasome inhibitors on the level of PKC
in Src-transformed cells implicates a proteasome-dependent mechanism of degradation. Proteasomes were originally shown to degrade ubiquitinated proteins (30)
, although nonubiquitinated proteins are now known to be degraded by this mechanism (31
, 32) . We do not believe that the effect of the proteasome inhibitors on PKC
is due to nonspecific activity because structurally and mechanistically distinct compounds have the same effect, increasing the level of PKC
in Src-transformed cells. Although we were unable to convince ourselves (using antiubiquitin immunoblotting) that PKC
is ubiquitinated after its tyrosine phosphorylation, we do not exclude this possibility. Recently, Lu et al. (48)
demonstrated that activation of PKC
, PKC
, or PKC
by phorbol esters triggers their ubiquitination and degradation. We frequently observed a tyrosine-phosphorylated 100110-kDa protein in PKC
immunoprecipitates from Src-transformed cells, but this is unlikely to represent polyubiquitinated PKC
because it does not have the characteristic ladder of bands normally associated with ubiquitination. However, it could represent monoubiquitination. PKC
may also be degraded by a mechanism involving the interleukin 1ß-converting enzyme-like proteases because it has two DXXD consensus caspase-3 cleavage sites (49)
.
The fact that a single point mutation (Y311F) of PKC
prevents its phosphorylation by Src suggests that Src uses a mechanism of processive phosphorylation. Such a mechanism has been implicated in the sequential phosphorylation of the
chain by Lck and the phosphorylation of p130cas by Abl. The effect of SH2 mutations suggests that processive phosphorylation proceeds via an initial high-affinity phosphorylation site to which the kinase binds using its SH2 domain, enabling subsequent phosphorylation of lower affinity sites (50
, 51)
. It is interesting to note that according to the prediction of the optimal substrate sequence of Src (AEEEIYGEFEAKKKK) by Songyang et al. (42)
, the sequence surrounding tyrosine 311 (ETVGIYQGFEKKTAV) suggests it is the highest affinity Src phosphorylation site on PKC
. However, the sequence bears little resemblance to the optimal Src SH2 binding sequence PQYEEI (52)
, raising the question of whether a third adaptor protein is involved. This SH2 model of processive phosphorylation does not exclude the possibility that tyrosine phosphorylation of Y311 changes the conformation of PKC
, exposing other phosphorylation sites.
We have not addressed the possibility that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC
modifies its substrate preference because the specific substrates involved in the antimitogenic effect need to be characterized. Also, we recognize that different stimuli, even though they result in PKC
tyrosine phosphorylation, may ultimately affect its activity in different ways, depending on other modes of regulation. PKC
was recently shown to be regulated by PDK1 or a homologue (53)
and is likely to be controlled in a manner similar to PKC
, by multisite phosphorylation (54, 55, 56)
.
Some PKC
substrates are common substrates for several PKC isoforms and thus are unlikely to mediate a PKC
-specific effect such as inhibition of cell growth. These include the myristoylated alanine-rich PKC-kinase substrate MARCKS, which is sequentially phosphorylated by conventional, novel, and atypical isoforms of PKC (57)
and the cytoskeletal protein vimentin (58)
. However, the elongation factor eEF-1
is a more exclusive PKC
substrate (59)
. This protein has been found in complexes containing ribosomal RNA, aminoacyl-t-RNA, and ribosomal protein L8, which was identified as a PKC
-associating protein by yeast 2-hybrid (60)
. Perhaps PKC
affects cell cycle progression through the regulation of protein synthesis. Alternatively, eEF-1
has also been implicated in the regulation of cytoskeletal structures (61
, 62)
.
The dual effects of Src on PKC
, its activation and its degradation, might go some way to explaining the conflicting reports of the effect of tyrosine phosphorylation on PKC
activity. Phosphorylation of PKC
in vitro will not have the complications of its degradation. Cellular studies not only deal with degradation, but also with what appear to be quite rapid kinetics of activation and inactivation.
There is considerable evidence implicating PKC
in the regulation of mitogenesis and as a downstream target of Src during PDGF stimulation of fibroblastic cell lines. However, it is not possible to place PKC
in a simple model that invokes a positive kinase cascade leading from Src to the regulation of DNA synthesis. We have demonstrated that the phosphorylation of PKC
by Src requires the tyrosine at position 311. Mutation of this site prevents PKC
from acting as a Src substrate, protects it from phosphorylation induced-degradation, and prevents Src from rescuing the inhibition of DNA synthesis by PKC
. The antimitogenic effects of PKC
lead us to speculate that its degradation may contribute to cell cycle progression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cells overexpressing both SrcY527F and PKC
were generated by stably transfecting 527 cells with pBabePuro PKC
. TGR-1 cells were a generous gift from John Sedivy (29)
. TGR-1 cells overexpressing human SrcY530F were generated by stable transfection with pBP human SrcY530F. TGR-1, NIH3T3, and HEK293 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FCS.
Antibodies.
The principal anti-PKC
used for immunoblotting was a mouse monoclonal IgG2b raised against amino acids 114289 of human PKC
, spanning the cysteine-rich repeats (Transduction Laboratories). The principal antibody used to immunoprecipitate PKC
and for immunofluorescent staining was an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide corresponding to amino acids 657673, mapping within the extreme COOH terminus of rat PKC
. Similar antibodies raised to the COOH-termini of PKC
and PKC
were also used (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Another anti-PKC
antibody also used for immunoprecipitation was a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a GST fusion of amino acids 1302 of rat PKC
(Zymed). Antiphosphotyrosine mouse monoclonal (IgG2bk) 4G10 and avian Src-specific monoclonal antibody EC10 were from Upstate Biotechnology, and anti-BrdUrd mouse monoclonal was from Boehringer Mannheim.
Plasmids.
Rat PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
were subcloned into pBabePuro3 for stable transfection and microinjection. Site-directed mutagenesis of PKC
was performed using the Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The Y311F mutation was made using oligonucleotide CGAATCCCTGGAATATTCCGACAGTC and its reverse complement. The Y372F mutation was made using oligonucleotide CAAGGAAAGGTTCTTTGCAATCAAGTACC and its reverse complement. The Y565F mutation was made using oligonucleotide GGACACACCACACTTCCCGCGCTGG and its reverse complement. The Y628F mutation was made using the oligonucleotide GAAATCCCCTTCAGACTTCAGCAACTTTGACCCAGAG and its reverse complement. Mutagenesis was verified by sequencing. An Eco47III/PinA1 fragment encompassing the Y311F mutation and PinA1/NdeI fragments encompassing the Y372F, Y565F, and Y628F mutations were each subcloned back into wild-type PKC
, and the inserts were sequenced to check for PCR errors.
Compounds.
Human recombinant PDGF was from Upstate Biotechnology. Proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucinal), clasto-lactacystin ß-lactone, and LY294002 were from Calbiochem). PP2 was provided by Sugen Inc. Cycloheximide and PMA were from Sigma. All other reagents were of analytical grade.
Immunoprecipitation.
Cells were washed in 10 ml of ice-cold PBS (100 µM sodium vanadate) and then lysed on ice in 1 ml of RIPA [described previously (63)
] per 10-cm dish. In the case of denaturing immunoprecipitation, cells were lysed in denaturing extraction buffer [2% SDS, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.3), 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM EDTA, and 100 µM sodium orthovanadate] and then diluted 20-fold in SDS-free RIPA. After protein determination, an equal concentration of each lysate was prepared for immunoprecipitation using 510 µl of affinity-purified anti-PKC
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and 20 µl of protein A/G-agarose. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were performed as described previously (64)
.
PKC
Kinase Assay.
Confluent cells on a 10-cm dish were washed with 10 ml of ice-cold PBS and then lysed on ice with 1.0 ml of ice-cold PKC
lysis buffer [0.8% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl, 100 µM sodium orthovanadate, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM PMSF, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin (pH 7.4)]. DTT (1 mM) was added after the determination of protein concentration. The cell lysate was clarified by tumbling with 20 µl of pansorbin for 1 h, followed by microfugation. PKC
was immunoprecipitated from 0.25 mg of lysate (or as otherwise indicated) using 10 µl of rabbit anti-PKC
and 20 µl of protein A/G-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 16 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitated PKC
was washed three times in ice-cold PKC
lysis buffer and once in minimal PKC
reaction buffer [30 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 6 mM magnesium acetate, 100 µM sodium orthovanadate, 0.25 mM EGTA, and 0.4% v/v NP-40]. PKC
reaction buffer was prepared by the addition of the following to minimal PKC
reaction buffer: 10 mM DTT; 0.2 mg/ml phosphatidylserine (Sigma; evaporated from chloroform and resuspended by sonication); 40 µM ATP (100 µCi/ml [
-32P]ATP); and 0.2 mg/ml MBP. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 25 µl of PKC
reaction buffer to each immunoprecipitate and mixing at 30°C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 10 µl 4x SDS-PAGE sample buffer. MBP phosphorylation was determined by 15% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography, followed by excision of the MBP band and liquid scintillation counting.
Microinjection and Immunofluorescent Staining.
Microinjection was performed with an Eppendorf Micromanipulator 5171 and Transjector 5246 using borosilicate thin wall capillaries with filament pulled on a Sutter Instrument Co. model P-97 Flaming/Brown micropipette puller. Cells were seeded at 30% confluence on coverslips, grown for 24 h, and then quiesced in 0.5% FCS and DMEM for 24 h before nuclear microinjection of the expression plasmids of interest (plasmid concentrations ranged between 40 and 200 µg/ml). After a period of 16 h to enable protein expression, cells were stimulated with 25 ng/ml PDGF in the presence of 20 µM BrdUrd for 24 h, fixed using methanol/acetone (1:1; room temperature), treated with 2 M HCl at 37°C for 15 min, and then washed twice with PBS. Cells were stained with a 1:40 dilution [in PBS (pH 7.6)] of affinity-purified rabbit anti-PKC isoform-specific antibodies (either anti-PKC
, anti-PKC
, or anti-PKC
, depending on the isoform being expressed) or EC10 anti-avian Src for 40 min, washed once in PBS, stained with a 1:40 dilution of Oregon Green-conjugated antirabbit IgG or Texas-Red-conjugated antimouse IgG (Molecular Probes), washed once in PBS, stained with a 1:10 dilution of anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody, washed once with PBS, stained with a 1:25 dilution of Texas Red-conjugated AffiniPure goat antimouse IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories) in PBS containing 1 µg/ml bisbenzimide (Sigma), washed once with PBS and once with deionized water, and then mounted Biomeda Gel/Mount (MO1). In the case of probing for Src using EC10, a directly conjugated fluorescein-anti-BrdUrd was used to detect de novo DNA synthesis. A C-Imaging 640 imaging system was used to store and analyze images of cells expressing the proteins of interest and to quantitate the proportion of cells staining positive for BrdUrd incorporation into the DNA.
Transient Transfection.
HEK293 cells were transfected using 10 µl of LipofectAMINE and 0.510 µg of DNA/10-cm dish in Optimem over 16 h and then either lysed in RIPA for immunoprecipitation or trypsinized and replated at equal density in 6-well plates to determine PKC
stability. The quantity of DNA used in each transfection is described in the figure legend.
35S Labeling of Cells and Pulse Chase.
Cells were labeled with 13 mCi of 35S Met/Cys (DuPont New England Nuclear) for 16 h in Cys/Met-free MEM and 10% dialyzed FCS and then either prepared for immunoprecipitation or washed in PBS and chase medium containing 1.52 mg/ml methionine, 2.4 mg/ml cysteine, and 10% FCS in DMEM. PKC
was immunoprecipitated from RIPA lysate, denatured in 2% SDS, diluted 20-fold in SDS-free RIPA, reimmunoprecipitated, and then prepared for SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
Northern Blotting.
RNA was prepared using the FastTrack 2.0 kit. Nothern blotting of PKC
mRNA was performed using a 32P-labeled Eco47III/PinA1 fragment from pBP PKC
.
Analysis of Results.
Microinjection results are shown as mean ± SE of at least three separate experiments. Statistical analyses were performed by Students t test with, P < 0.05 taken as the level of significance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at SUGEN Inc., 230 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080-4811. Phone: (650) 553-8300; Fax: (650) 553-8304; E-mail: sara-courtneidge{at}sugen.com ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor BB PKC, protein kinase C; PDGFR, PDGF receptor ß; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; MBP, myelin basic protein; RIPA, radioimmunoprecipitation assay. ![]()
3 R. A. Blake and S. A. Courtneidge, unpublished observations. ![]()
Received for publication 2/ 4/99. Revision received 3/12/99. Accepted for publication 3/12/99.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Mol. Cell. Biol., 14: 6727-6735, 1994.
from porcine spleen by src in vitro Dependence on the activated state of protein kinase C
. FEBS Lett., 347: 85-89, 1994.[Medline]
in response to its activation. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 2349-2352, 1994.
in response to the activation of the high-affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E modifies its substrate recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 9112-9116, 1995.
. J. Biol. Chem., 268: 26079-26081, 1993.
in v-Src-transformed fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 13275-13280, 1997.
by PDGF in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells: inhibition by TGF-ß 1. Artery, 22: 140-154, 1996.[Medline]
inhibits Sis-induced transformation of NIH3T3 cells. Oncogene, 13: 731-737, 1996.[Medline]
subspecies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 10159-10163, 1992.
and -
in NIH 3T3 cells induces opposite effects on growth, morphology, anchorage dependence, and tumorigenicity. J. Biol. Chem., 268: 6090-6096, 1993.
and
on the growth properties of human glioma cell line U251 MG. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 201: 363-372, 1994.[Medline]
,
,
and
in C6 glioma cells. TPA induces translocation and down-regulation of conventional and new PKC isoforms but not atypical PKC
. FEBS Lett., 332: 169-173, 1993.[Medline]
and degradation by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 20973-20976, 1996.
B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 3308-3312, 1996.
phosphorylated upon activation of the high affinity receptor for IgE in rat basophilic leukemia cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 214: 888-894, 1995.[Medline]
phosphorylation site. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 26404-26409, 1996.
in salivary gland epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 13490-13495, 1995.
. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 3418-3428, 1997.
from late-phase down-regulation, despite synergy in diacylglycerol accumulation. Biochem. J., 318: 519-525, 1996.
mRNA is down-regulated transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 16040-16046, 1996.
-chain and IL-2 production. J. Immunol., 159: 2292-2300, 1997.
. Biochem. J., 301: 443-448, 1994.
on serine 657 controls the accumulation of active enzyme and contributes to its phosphatase-resistant state. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 3544-3549, 1997.
associates with vimentin intermediate filaments in differentiated HL60 cells. Exp. Cell Res., 225: 366-373, 1996.[Medline]
-specific phosphorylation of the elongation factor eEF-
and an eEF-1
peptide at threonine 431. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 6156-6162, 1995.
isoform of protein kinase C. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 36: 51-61, 1997.[Medline]
inhibits polymerization at filament ends. J. Cell Biol., 135: 1309-1321, 1996.
. Science (Washington DC), 266: 282-285, 1994.
2 but not phospholipase C-
1 in human platelets. FEBS Lett., 353: 212-216, 1994.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. E. M. Gibbs, T. Miralem, N. Lerner-Marmarosh, C. Tudor, and M. D. Maines Formation of Ternary Complex of Human Biliverdin Reductase-Protein Kinase C{delta}-ERK2 Protein Is Essential for ERK2-mediated Activation of Elk1 Protein, Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B, and Inducible Nitric-oxidase Synthase (iNOS) J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2012; 287(2): 1066 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, C.-M. Cao, and R.-P. Xiao Kinase activity-independent anchoring function of protein kinase C-{delta}. Focus on "Protein kinase C-{delta} regulates the subcellular localization of Shc in H2O2-treated cardiomyocytes" Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2010; 299(4): C733 - C735. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-H. Xue, C.-Q. Zhao, G.-L. Chua, S.-W. Tan, X.-Y. Tang, S.-C. Wong, and S.-M. Tan Integrin {alpha}M{beta}2 Clustering Triggers Phosphorylation and Activation of Protein Kinase C{delta} that Regulates Transcription Factor Foxp1 Expression in Monocytes J. Immunol., April 1, 2010; 184(7): 3697 - 3709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cataldi, V. Di Giacomo, M. Rapino, S. Zara, and R. A. Rana Ionizing Radiation Induces Apoptotic Signal Through Protein Kinase C{delta} (delta) and Survival Signal Through Akt and Cyclic-Nucleotide Response Element-Binding Protein (CREB) in Jurkat T Cells Biol. Bull., October 1, 2009; 217(2): 202 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Van Schaeybroeck, D. M. Kelly, J. Kyula, S. Stokesberry, D. A. Fennell, P. G. Johnston, and D. B. Longley Src and ADAM-17-Mediated Shedding of Transforming Growth Factor-{alpha} Is a Mechanism of Acute Resistance to TRAIL Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 68(20): 8312 - 8321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakashima, G. D. Frank, H. Shirai, A. Hinoki, S. Higuchi, H. Ohtsu, K. Eguchi, A. Sanjay, M. E. Reyland, P. J. Dempsey, et al. Novel Role of Protein Kinase C-{delta} Tyr311 Phosphorylation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Hypertrophy by Angiotensin II Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 232 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Morita, H. Matsuzaki, T. Yamamoto, Y. Fukami, and U. Kikkawa Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Phosphorylates Protein Kinase C {delta} at Tyr332 to form a Trimeric Complex with p66Shc in the H2O2-stimulated Cells J. Biochem., January 1, 2008; 143(1): 31 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cao, K. Yu, C. Banh, V. Nguyen, A. Ritz, B. J. Raphael, Y. Kawakami, T. Kawakami, and A. R. Salomon Quantitative Time-Resolved Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Mast Cell Signaling J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 5864 - 5876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul, V. Anantharam, Y. Yang, C. J. Choi, A. Kanthasamy, and A. G. Kanthasamy Tyrosine Phosphorylation Regulates the Proteolytic Activation of Protein Kinase C{delta} in Dopaminergic Neuronal Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28721 - 28730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Murugappan, H. Shankar, S. Bhamidipati, R. T. Dorsam, J. Jin, and S. P. Kunapuli Molecular mechanism and functional implications of thrombin-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC{delta} in platelets Blood, July 15, 2005; 106(2): 550 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wheaton and K. Riabowol Protein Kinase C{delta} Blocks Immediate-Early Gene Expression in Senescent Cells by Inactivating Serum Response Factor Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2004; 24(16): 7298 - 7311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, X. Wang, N. Rasheed, Y. Hu, S. Boast, T. Ishii, K. Nakayama, K. I. Nakayama, and S. P. Goff Distinct roles of c-Abl and Atm in oxidative stress response are mediated by protein kinase C {delta} Genes & Dev., August 1, 2004; 18(15): 1824 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. O. Rybin, J. Guo, A. Sabri, H. Elouardighi, E. Schaefer, and S. F. Steinberg Stimulus-specific Differences in Protein Kinase C{delta} Localization and Activation Mechanisms in Cardiomyocytes J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19350 - 19361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Wrobel, J. Debnath, E. Lin, S. Beausoleil, M. F. Roussel, and J. S. Brugge Autocrine CSF-1R activation promotes Src-dependent disruption of mammary epithelial architecture J. Cell Biol., April 26, 2004; 165(2): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. JACKSON and D. A. FOSTER The enigmatic protein kinase C{delta}: complex roles in cell proliferation and survival FASEB J, April 1, 2004; 18(6): 627 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kajimoto, Y. Shirai, N. Sakai, T. Yamamoto, H. Matsuzaki, U. Kikkawa, and N. Saito Ceramide-induced Apoptosis by Translocation, Phosphorylation, and Activation of Protein Kinase C{delta} in the Golgi Complex J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12668 - 12676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sumitomo, T. Asano, J. Asakuma, T. Asano, D. M. Nanus, and M. Hayakawa Chemosensitization of Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer with Neutral Endopeptidase Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 260 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Tapia, L. J. Garcia-Marin, and R. T. Jensen Cholecystokinin-stimulated Protein Kinase C-{delta} Kinase Activation, Tyrosine Phosphorylation, and Translocation Are Mediated by Src Tyrosine Kinases in Pancreatic Acinar Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35220 - 35230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yamaura, T. Turoczi, F. Yamamoto, M. A. Q. Siddqui, N. Maulik, and D. K. Das STAT signaling in ischemic heart: a role of STAT5A in ischemic preconditioning Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H476 - H482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Crosby and A. W. Poole Physical and Functional Interaction between Protein Kinase C {delta} and Fyn Tyrosine Kinase in Human Platelets J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24533 - 24541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-L. Tang, E. Kodani, H. Takano, M. Hill, K. Shinmura, T. M. Vondriska, P. Ping, and R. Bolli Protein tyrosine kinase signaling is necessary for NO donor-induced late preconditioning against myocardial stunning Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): H1441 - H1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bao, G. Gur, and Y. Yarden Src promotes destruction of c-Cbl: Implications for oncogenic synergy between Src and growth factor receptors PNAS, March 4, 2003; 100(5): 2438 - 2443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Junttila, R. P. Bourette, L. R. Rohrschneider, and O. Silvennoinen M-CSF induced differentiation of myeloid precursor cells involves activation of PKC-{delta} and expression of Pkare J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2003; 73(2): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shibukawa, M. Takahashi, I. Laffont, K. Honke, and N. Taniguchi Down-regulation of Hydrogen Peroxide-induced PKCdelta Activation in N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III-transfected HeLaS3 Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3197 - 3203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Joseloff, C. Cataisson, H. Aamodt, H. Ocheni, P. Blumberg, A. J. Kraker, and S. H. Yuspa Src Family Kinases Phosphorylate Protein Kinase C delta on Tyrosine Residues and Modify the Neoplastic Phenotype of Skin Keratinocytes J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12318 - 12323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Blass, I. Kronfeld, G. Kazimirsky, P. M. Blumberg, and C. Brodie Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Protein Kinase C{delta} Is Essential for Its Apoptotic Effect in Response to Etoposide Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 182 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Wooten, M. L. Vandenplas, M. L. Seibenhener, T. Geetha, and M. T. Diaz-Meco Nerve Growth Factor Stimulates Multisite Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Activation of the Atypical Protein Kinase C's via a src Kinase Pathway Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 8414 - 8427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wakino, U. Kintscher, Z. Liu, S. Kim, F. Yin, M. Ohba, T. Kuroki, A. H. Schonthal, W. A. Hsueh, and R. E. Law Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma Ligands Inhibit Mitogenic Induction of p21Cip1 by Modulating the Protein Kinase Cdelta Pathway in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2001; 276(50): 47650 - 47657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Saito, J. Haendeler, Y. Hojo, K. Yamamoto, and B. C. Berk Receptor Heterodimerization: Essential Mechanism for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Induced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 6387 - 6394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hattori, H. Otani, T. Uchiyama, H. Imamura, J. Cui, N. Maulik, G. A. Cordis, L. Zhu, and D. K. Das Src tyrosine kinase is the trigger but not the mediator of ischemic preconditioning Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): H1066 - H1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Boney, H. Sekimoto, P. A. Gruppuso, and A. R. Frackelton Jr. Src Family Tyrosine Kinases Participate in Insulin-like Growth Factor I Mitogenic Signaling in 3T3-L1 Cells Cell Growth Differ., July 1, 2001; 12(7): 379 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Konishi, E. Yamauchi, H. Taniguchi, T. Yamamoto, H. Matsuzaki, Y. Takemura, K. Ohmae, U. Kikkawa, and Y. Nishizuka Phosphorylation sites of protein kinase C {delta} in H2O2-treated cells and its activation by tyrosine kinase in vitro PNAS, June 5, 2001; 98(12): 6587 - 6592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Benes and S. P. Soltoff Modulation of PKC{delta} tyrosine phosphorylation and activity in salivary and PC-12 cells by Src kinases Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): C1498 - C1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhong, Z. Lu, T. Abbas, A. Hornia, K. Chatakondu, N. Barile, P. Kaplan, and D. A. Foster Novel Tumor-promoting Property of Tamoxifen Cell Growth Differ., April 1, 2001; 12(4): 187 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Blake, M. A. Broome, X. Liu, J. Wu, M. Gishizky, L. Sun, and S. A. Courtneidge SU6656, a Selective Src Family Kinase Inhibitor, Used To Probe Growth Factor Signaling Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2000; 20(23): 9018 - 9027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sumitomo, R. Shen, J. S. Goldberg, J. Dai, D. Navarro, and D. M. Nanus Neutral Endopeptidase Promotes Phorbol Ester-induced Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells by Inhibiting Neuropeptide-induced Protein Kinase C {{delta}} Degradation Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 60(23): 6590 - 6596. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Otieno and T. W. Kensler A Role for Protein Kinase C-{{delta}} in the Regulation of Ornithine Decarboxylase Expression by Oxidative Stress Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(16): 4391 - 4396. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hornia, Z. Lu, T. Sukezane, M. Zhong, T. Joseph, P. Frankel, and D. A. Foster Antagonistic Effects of Protein Kinase C alpha and delta on Both Transformation and Phospholipase D Activity Mediated by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 1999; 19(11): 7672 - 7680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bahr, A. Rohwer, L. Stempka, G. Rincke, F. Marks, and M. Gschwendt DIK, a Novel Protein Kinase That Interacts with Protein Kinase Cdelta . CLONING, CHARACTERIZATION, AND GENE ANALYSIS J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2000; 275(46): 36350 - 36357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kronfeld, G. Kazimirsky, P. S. Lorenzo, S. H. Garfield, P. M. Blumberg, and C. Brodie Phosphorylation of Protein Kinase Cdelta on Distinct Tyrosine Residues Regulates Specific Cellular Functions J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2000; 275(45): 35491 - 35498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Pepio and W. S. Sossin Membrane Translocation of Novel Protein Kinase Cs Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the C2 Domain J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2001; 276(6): 3846 - 3855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Soltoff Rottlerin Is a Mitochondrial Uncoupler That Decreases Cellular ATP Levels and Indirectly Blocks Protein Kinase Cdelta Tyrosine Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., October 5, 2001; 276(41): 37986 - 37992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Konishi, E. Yamauchi, H. Taniguchi, T. Yamamoto, H. Matsuzaki, Y. Takemura, K. Ohmae, U. Kikkawa, and Y. Nishizuka Phosphorylation sites of protein kinase C {delta} in H2O2-treated cells and its activation by tyrosine kinase in vitro PNAS, June 5, 2001; 98(12): 6587 - 6592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |