| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |
Cell Growth & Differentiation, Vol 5, Issue 1 1-8, Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Cancer Research
ARTICLES |
MS O'Dorisio, F Chen, TM O'Dorisio, D Wray and SJ Qualman
Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, Columbus 43205.
Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of children. Neuroblastoma tumors derive from the neural crest and synthesize neurotransmitters including the neuropeptide somatostatin. This study was designed to characterize somatostatin receptors both in primary neuroblastoma tumors and in two neuroblastoma cell lines, SKNSH and IMR32. Somatostatin receptors were identified in 6 of 7 Stage I and II compared to 7 of 19 Stage III and IV tumors. Down-regulation of somatostatin receptor binding was observed in five tumors during disease progression. A lack of high affinity binding of somatostatin was identified as a poor prognostic indicator; negative binding correlated with advanced disease and death. Somatostatin receptor binding was observed in the IMR32 cell line, but not in the SKNSH cell line. IMR32 cells demonstrated a single class of high affinity binding sites for both somatostatin and a synthetic analogue, octreotide (Kd 0.16 +/- 0.05 nM and 0.89 +/- 0.23 nM, respectively). Somatostatin and octreotide inhibited both vasoactive intestinal peptide-mediated and forskolin-mediated cyclic AMP accumulation in IMR32 cells. Somatostatin and octreotide inhibition of signal transduction was attenuated by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. Octreotide inhibited proliferation of IMR32 cells by 70% in a 6-day culture. In contrast, octreotide did not exhibit high affinity binding in SKNSH cells and had no effect on cyclic AMP accumulation or on proliferation in SKNSH cells. Together, these data indicate that octreotide interacts with high affinity somatostatin receptors to modulate signal transduction and regulate proliferation in neuroblastoma cell lines. These data also suggest that somatostatin receptor expression may be an independent prognostic factor in primary neuroblastoma tumors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Khanna, D. Bushnell, and M. S. O'Dorisio Utility of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Analogues for Staging/Restaging and Treatment of Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Pediatric Tumors Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(4): 382 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Gunn, J. E. Schwimer, M. Cox, C. T. Anthony, M. S. O'Dorisio, and E. A. Woltering In Vitro Modeling of the Clinical Interactions Between Octreotide and 111In-Pentetreotide: Is There Evidence of Somatostatin Receptor Downregulation? J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 354 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Kushner Neuroblastoma: A Disease Requiring a Multitude of Imaging Studies J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1172 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Reubi Peptide Receptors as Molecular Targets for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2003; 24(4): 389 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Osmani, J. Davies, C. E. Oakley, B. R. Oakley, and S. A. Osmani TINA Interacts with the NIMA Kinase in Aspergillus nidulans and Negatively Regulates Astral Microtubules during Metaphase Arrest Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2003; 14(8): 3169 - 3179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Reubi, B. Waser, Q. Liu, J. A. Laissue, and A. Schonbrunn Subcellular Distribution of Somatostatin sst2A Receptors in Human Tumors of the Nervous and Neuroendocrine Systems: Membranous Versus Intracellular Location J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2000; 85(10): 3882 - 3891. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Turman and C. A. Apple Human proximal tubular epithelial cells express somatostatin: regulation by growth factors and cAMP Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): F1095 - F1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cell Growth & Differentiation |